The problem
Noisy conditional-independence tests can be mutually incompatible. A repair step must decide which facts to release without hiding that decision.
The approach
The work transfers minimal correction set reasoning from Answer Set Programming into Causal ABA, defines optimal correction sets using release costs, and computes them through standard weak constraints.
What the work establishes
- Substantially increases the identification rate of true constraints in the reported experiments.
- Reduces the number of compatible output causal graphs.
- Improves graph reconstruction according to standard metrics, with an explicit optimisation/runtime trade-off.
Why it matters to CArLA
Optimal correction sets make inconsistency handling principled and auditable: CArLA can explain which constraints were released, why they were selected, and which conclusions remain supported.
Citation
Russo, F., Mazzotta, G., Dodaro, C., Ricca, F., & Toni, F. (2026). Optimal Correction Sets for Argumentative Causal Discovery. LINDA 2026, Lisbon, Portugal.